2026 Midterms
AI Industry’s $100 Million Shadow Campaign Floods Midterm Elections — Without Mentioning AI
Competing super PACs backed by Andreessen Horowitz, Greg Brockman, and others spend heavily on immigration and healthcare ads while avoiding any mention of artificial intelligence.
The artificial intelligence industry has quietly become one of the most powerful forces in the 2026 midterm elections, with competing super PACs pouring more than $100 million into congressional races across the country — yet the television ads, digital campaigns, and mailers funded by that money almost never mention artificial intelligence at all. Instead, the industry’s political spending has been channeled into anodyne advertisements about immigration, healthcare affordability, and opposition to or support for the Trump administration, a deliberate strategy that campaign finance experts say is designed to elect AI-friendly lawmakers without triggering the public backlash that direct advocacy for the technology might provoke.
At the center of the spending spree is “Leading the Future,” a super PAC that has amassed roughly $100 million from just two donors: the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, which contributed $50 million, and Greg Brockman, the former OpenAI president and co-founder, who matched that sum from his personal fortune. The PAC has targeted more than two dozen competitive House and Senate races, flooding airwaves in swing districts with ads that focus almost exclusively on pocketbook issues and border security. A review of the PAC’s advertising disclosures by NBC News found that not a single one of its more than 150 television spots contained the words “artificial intelligence,” “AI,” or “technology.”
On the opposite side of the ledger, a rival network of donors organized under the banner “Public First” has pledged $50 million to support candidates who favor stronger AI regulation, including mandatory safety testing, algorithmic transparency requirements, and federal licensing for frontier model developers. The group’s backers include several prominent AI safety researchers and at least two former members of Congress. Notably, the two blocs have converged on the same strategy of avoiding direct mention of AI in their voter-facing materials, focusing instead on healthcare and economic messaging that polls more favorably with undecided voters.
The rivalry has produced its most dramatic showdown in New York’s 12th Congressional District, where super PACs linked to both OpenAI and Anthropic are spending heavily on opposing candidates. Leading the Future has backed the incumbent, who has called for a regulatory “light touch” on AI development, while Public First is supporting a challenger who has made AI oversight a centerpiece of her platform — though even her campaign ads lead with healthcare and housing rather than technology policy. Campaign finance watchdogs have warned that the scale and opacity of the AI industry’s political spending risks creating a new category of “dark influence” in American elections, with voters unable to discern the true interests behind the advertisements that fill their screens.